links for 2007-06-29


Do Libraries Innovate: Blogging at ALA

Check out this quasi-transcript (and this one too) of the session “The Ultimate Debate: Do Libraries Innovate?” Topics discussed include why libraries aren’t innovative, the relationship between IT profession and library profession, and how to promote change in an professional organization (ALA)–all very relevant to art librarians/VR curators. ALA conference program description:

The Ultimate Debate: Do Libraries Innovate?
LITA
Track: Transformation & Innovations
Libraries did not invent Google Book Search, Library Think, Facebook, or any other innovation critical to the new information era/knowledge economy. We make use of these inventions. But is that enough? What prevents us from being more inventive? Join four thought-provoking speakers for a debate on these questions and a search for answers.
Speakers: Roy Tennant, California Digital Library; Stephen Abram, SirsiDynix; Joseph Janes, University of Washington; Karen Schneider, Florida State University

We’ve discussed changes we’d like to see in ArLiS/NA, but maybe the question “Do [Art] Libraries innovate?” would be help us get to the root of the issue. I think that innovation can increase the significance, not to mention status, of our profession and professional organization. We are an imaginative, resourceful group of people who value creativity (in visual art, architecture and other fields) — it follows that art librarians would or could be an innovative group of professionals. What do you think?


links for 2007-06-26


Hourly Librarian II (or Librarian I in training) – The New York Public Library

This is an hourly Librarian II (or Librarian I on a training basis) position, temporary for six months.Under the general supervision of the Librarian III, catalogs original designs, artwork and prints. Performs original and copy cataloging in OCLC, and updates records in local Innovative Interfaces system, CATNYP. Produces MARC records in accordance with local and national standards. Creates authority records for personal names and corporate entities not found in the Library of Congress Name Authority File. Identifies conservation needs. Consults as needed with appropriate NYPL archival, conservation and cataloging staff. Performs related duties as required.
Required Experience

ALA accredited Master’s degree in Library and Information Studies. Master’s degree or undergraduate degree in art, dance or dance history preferred. Successfully demonstrated professional experience required for appointment at the Librarian II level. Successfully demonstrated professional cataloging or archival processing experience, including original cataloging. Successfully demonstrated professional knowledge of dance history. Successfully demonstrated experience with AACR2, MARC formats, LC subject headings, LC cataloging policies and practices, and/or artworks cataloging resources. Successfully demonstrated ability to work in a computer-cataloging environment; experience with OCLC and CATNYP (Innovative interfaces) preferred. Successfully demonstrated ability to follow detailed written and verbal instructions and work effectively with staff at all levels. Successfully demonstrated organizational, written and verbal communication skills. Successfully demonstrated initiative, accuracy, attention to detail, judgment and ability to work well independently and collaboratively in a team environment. Successfully demonstrated computer skills, including MS Word and Excel. Demonstrated experience handling and cataloging original artworks preferred.

Education Requirements

ALA accredited Master’s degree in Library and Information Studies. Master’s degree or undergraduate degree in art, dance or dance history preferred.

Location

Manhattan

Job Type

Temporary

Reference No.

LM-L2DAN

Contact

HR Dept job code: LM-L2DAN
The New York Public Library
188 Madison Ave., Fifth Floor
New York, NY 10016 USA
Phone: 212-592-7300
Fax: 212-592-7327

Email:  lsresumes@nypl.org

WebSite:  www.nypl.org

Library Information

The Jerome Robbins Dance Division of The New York Public Library is the largest and most comprehensive archive in the world devoted to the documentation of dance. Chronicling the art of dance in all its manifestations – ballet, ethnic, modern, social, and folk – the division is much more than a library in the usual sense of the word. It is part museum, part film production center, and part consulting service to the professional dance community. It preserves the history of dance by gathering diverse written, visual, and aural resources, and it works to ensure the art forms continuity through an active documentation program.

Posting Date

June 15, 2007


links for 2007-06-25


Art and Architecture Librarian – Pratt Institute

Position Summary:
Under the supervision of the Director of Libraries, the Art and Architecture Librarian provides high-quality services in subject areas related to Pratt’s art and architecture collection. Responsibilities include collection development in architecture, fashion and industrial design; instruction; committee and task force work within and outside the Library; serving as liaison to the Schools of Art and Design and Architecture; and other activities deemed necessary for the smooth provision of information services. This is a full-time twelve (12) month per year tenure-track faculty position at the assistant/associate professor rank. Some evening hours are required.
Read the rest of this entry »


Wayne State University Recruits 21st Century Art Librarians

Congratulations to the recipients of this grant! We would love to hear more about the program.

Wayne State Library System Receives Institute of Museum and Library Services Grant to Recruit 21st Century Librarians
 
The Wayne State University Library and Information Science announced the recipients of the “Recruiting and Educating the 21st Century Fine and Performing Arts Librarian.” The recipients are:
 
Asako Chihaya, Ferndale, Mich.
Justine Rebeca Flores, Detroit, Mich.
Paul Steven Gallagher, Wyandotte, Mich.
Amisha Sanise Harijan, Detroit, Mich.
Sheila M. Palmer, Detroit, Mich.
Bridghette Michelle Parker, Southfield, Mich.
Sara Mary Quimby, Phoenix, Ariz.
Kallene D. Rutherford, Detroit, Mich.
Gladys Santiago, Brandon, Fla.
Molly Jean Schoen, East Lansing, Mich.
Serena Jennifer Vaquilar, Northridge, Calif.
Joseph E. Weber, Belleville, Mich.
 
Alternates:

Nicolet V. Elert, Detroit, Mich.
Kristine Anne Kuhl, Saline, Mich.
Kathryn Elizabeth Reineke, Flushing, Mich.
Ben Richardson, Anoka, Minn.
 
The grants are designed to help offset a current shortage of school library media specialists, library school faculty and librarians working in underserved communities, as well as a looming shortage of library directors and other senior librarians, many of whom are expected to retire in the next 20 years. “I’m very impressed with the 49 individuals who applied for the Fine Arts Librarian program, and feel they will receive an excellent education and experience during their two years with us. It is unfortunate that we only have space for 12,” said Joseph J. Mika, director of the Wayne State Library and Information Science Program.
 
Partners in the Detroit collaborative will include the Detroit Institute of Arts, the Detroit Symphony Orchestra and the Michigan Opera Theater. Students will be placed in mentoring relationships with senior librarians. In addition to earning master’s degrees in library and information science from Wayne State University, the recruits will receive practical training from mentors in building and organizing a new library; managing an orchestra library; providing services in a well-established library; and providing services to faculty in an academic environment.
 
Jennifer Moldwin Gustafson, former Head of the Detroit Institute of Arts Research Library & Archives (1993-2005) is program coordinator for this project. “It is exciting that these important cultural institutions of Detroit are working together to organize and preserve their rich history for future generations,” she said.
 
The Wayne State University Library System consists of the universities’ five libraries: The David Adamany Undergraduate Library, the Purdy/Kresge Library, the Shiffman Medical Library, the Arthur Neef Law Library and the Science and Engineering Library, the Library and Information Science Program and UGE 1000 general education course.
 
Wayne State University is a premier institution offering more than 350 academic programs through 12 schools and colleges to more than 33,000 students in metropolitan Detroit.


links for 2007-06-21


links for 2007-06-20


Web Designer / Digital Imagist, Lynchburg, VA

Lynchburg College in Lynchburg, Virginia has an opening for a combo web
designer/digital image cataloguer.  The position is 70% in web services
(that’s the “web designer” part), and 30% in the public relations
office.

Job details are at

http://www.lynchburg.edu/Documents/HR/Jobs/Pcptwebima.htm

Lynchburg College employment page is

http://www.lynchburg.edu/employment.xml

Also mentioned in an email forward: web design portfolio required and XSLT talent and flash experience preferred.


Visual and Digital Materials Archivist, Atlanta

Visual and Digital Materials Archivist

Georgia Institute of Technology Library and Information Center

Position:

The primary purpose of this position is to collect and preserve architectural drawings and to foster a relationship with the College of Architecture. The secondary purpose is to collect and preserve photographs and digital materials. Reporting to the Head, Archives and Records Management Department, the visual and digital materials archivist at Georgia Tech is responsible for identifying and collecting visual (architectural drawings and photographs) and digital visual materials. Arrange and describe visual (architectural drawings and photographs) and digital materials. Create finding aids and other descriptions in appropriate mark up text and post them to the website. Manage digital visual materials (architectural drawings and photographs) stored in the Archives’ dark archive. Provide reference service on the Archives Department reference desk. Develop processing plan in coordination with other departmental archivists to determine appropriate levels of description and analysis. Maintain accurate and timely information on copyright pertaining to the use of visual materials. Provide and supervise production of images for patron use.

Qualifications:

Required: ALA-accredited master’s degree in library and information science, master’s degree in archival administration, or equivalent advanced degree. Minimum three years of archival experience with visual material (photographs and/or architectural drawings) processes. Requires working knowledge of Encoded Archival Description (EAD) and Dublin Core, Art and Architecture Thesaurus (AAT), as well as other related archival descriptive standards; knowledge of the preservation needs of archival collections; experience providing reference assistance. Understanding of issues related to digital archival materials such as digital conversion and intellectual property issues. Also requires ability to communicate effectively, orally, and in writing; excellent organizational skills, accuracy attention to detail; ability to work independently and collaboratively in a team environment; supervisor skills; and demonstrated interest in professional activities. Must be able to lift 40 pound boxes.

Preferred: MLIS or equivalent degree with architecture-related experience. Knowledge of preservation needs of architectural drawings and numerous copying processes.

Salary and Benefits:

Appointments will be made at the Archivist I (entry-level) or Archivist II level. Appointment level and salary are based on qualifications and experience. Minimum salary for Archivist I is $42,000. Archivists are members of the General Faculty and are non-tenured. The benefits package includes 21 days vacation, 12 paid holidays, 12 days sick leave, health/dental insurance options, and retirement options including TIAA/CREF. Relocation Allowance supported by the Price Gilbert, Jr. Charitable Fund. Visit the Georgia Tech Human Resources http://www.ohr.gatech.edu/ page to view the benefits package.

Environment:

As an ARL library supporting an institution with nearly 5,000 graduate students and over $300 million per year in research activity, Georgia Tech provides an environment that will challenge and engage creative leaders on the frontier of new ways to capture and manage intellectual content. Through its dynamic team of librarians and technologists, the Library’s Technology and Resource Services Division provides the operations needed to maintain the information resources required to support an exceptionally energetic academic enterprise.

The Library and Information Center, a member of the Association of Research Libraries, is central to the Institute’s instructional and research programs. The Georgia Institute of Technology, with nearly 20,000 faculty, students, and staff is one of the nation’s outstanding universities, with nationally recognized programs in science and engineering. The Library is a leader in library automation, participates in the statewide consortium, Galileo, and provides access to an ever-increasing number of databases, electronic books and electronic journals.

Application Process:

Applications will be reviewed upon receipt and will be accepted until the position is filled. Candidates are urged to apply as soon as possible to receive full consideration. Employment is contingent on proof of the legal right to work in the United States. Send letter of application, resume, and names, addresses, e-mail addresses, and phone numbers of 5 references to:

Sharon Baines, SPHR HR Officer Library and Information Center Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, GA 30332-0900 sharon.baines@library.gatech.edu


Call for Papers: VRA Bulletin Special Issue

Dear VRA Members:

I will be guest editing a special issue of the VRA Bulletin in Spring 2008 on “Digital Collaborations.” I am intentionally making this an open call for abstracts for paper proposals to get as wide a range of articles on as many different topics as possible, both within the arts and humanities disciplines and beyond.

The broad question that I am asking is:

How are digital image collections now working or being implemented across the larger environment, either within one institution or between institutions?

I am interested in substantive articles from the collage/university, library, private/commercial sector, and museum communities.

Papers may address digital collaborations within cross-campus, multi-campus, single and multi-institution, commercial image consortia, library consortia, environments.

Topics that may be addressed are image database development, metadata issues, institution-wide image delivery, user issues, user and staff training programs, funding and staffing issues, personal collection access and delivery, commercial collections, image/text/audio/video collections, etc.

Please submit a one-page abstract of your paper proposal to me via e-mail by August 1, 2007 (taormina@duke.edu). Final articles should be between 2,500-4,000 words, not counting illustrations. Final papers will be due by December 31, 2007.

Thank you,

John J. Taormina
Director, Visual Resources Center
Dept. of Art, Art History & Visual Studies
Duke University
Box 90764
112 East Duke Building
Durham NC 27708-0764


links for 2007-06-15


Hockney vs. iPod

David Hockney argues that the rise of portable music is causing the demise of visual culture. Are we shuffling our way to an artless society?

Read the article…


Second Life, Museums, and Archaeological Modeling

Richard Urban blogs at Inherent Vice on his collaborative poster session, “Second Life, Museums, and Archaeological Modeling” for the Digital Humanities Conference.

The researchers have identified the trend of user-created cultural institutions, rather than institution-created cultural sites.  Plus, “serious leisure” and Oldenburg’s “third spaces” – what an amazing opportunity to create new spaces for cultural creativity!


Rome Reborn Model Pushes Frontiers of 3-D Simulation

From Wired:

Colosseum, picture taken by Andreas RibbefjordRome was at its peak in the fourth century, with over a million inhabitants. It was the largest metropolis the world had ever seen: Not until Victorian London, 1500 years later, did an urban area surpass Rome’s size. This week, an unusual combination of classicists, engineers and archaeologists unveiled something not even HBO and Hollywood could manage – a complete 3-D model of Rome, circa 320 A.D.

It’s a huge model for a huge city. Running a fly-through, real-time model of the ancient city requires serious processing power. “It’s a big engineering problem to have a big model of something that has to be rendered that fast,” says Bernard Frischer, director of the Institute for Advanced Technology in the Humanities at the University of Virginia and the “Rome Reborn” project’s organizer.

To create the digital model, researchers scanned a 3,000 square foot, 1/250 plaster model of the city – the “Plastico di Roma Antica” – which was completed in the 1970s. Because of the model’s intricacy – the Plastico’s Coliseum is only 8 inches tall — Italian engineers used laser radar originally designed to measure precise tolerances on jet parts to scan within a tenth of a millimeter. Each 6-by-6 section contained 60 million data points.

 

Read more…


links for 2007-06-14


ARLIS/NA Conference Categories/Tags

There is a new tag called Atlanta 2007 ARLIS/NA Conference for all posts related to the 2007 conference (including travel awards, sessions, summaries, etc.). Also, everything tagged as Denver 2008 ARLIS/NA Conference is available by clicking Join the Discussion in the left column. Thanks!


Next-Generation OPACs Conference Proposal and Call for Speakers

This is what our proposal form looks like. Thank you to all of those who contributed to the proposal discussion. We won’t know if the proposal is accepted until August 2007 or later. If you have suggestions for speakers or a better session title, please let us know by July 15, 2007.

Program Title: Next Generation OPACs
Moderator: Megan Macken
Program type: Program type: session
Workshop: 2 hour
Brief Description of Content: Online Public Access Catalogs (OPACs) are undergoing drastic transformations. OPAC creators are embracing “Web 2.0” technologies that foster decentralized, social interactions. Progressive, Web-based OPACs now encourage patrons to rate, review, tag, and even comment on the catalog’s items. The visual aspects of these innovations–graphics-based interfaces, visually stimulating content, and the like–have exciting implications for both art information professionals and the visual learners they serve. How can art information professionals effectively respond to this rapidly changing, user-centric environment? Moreover, how can proactive art librarians capitalize on these technologies to improve access, delivery, and instruction? Which emerging technologies will benefit art library users most, and how can art librarians lobby both vendors and their own institutions to develop Web 2.0 tools? This session will
expose conference attendees to the latest OPAC technology and explore best practices for instruction and implementation of Web 2.0-compliant OPACs. Further, it will empower them to advocate progressive library tools at their home institutions in order to provide the usability and interactive features of Web 2.0 applications their users expect. Finally, this session will infuse the conference with a high level of energy and excitement by bringing in practicing professionals who are on the cutting edge of library technology.
Description- Speakers: To be determined. We are looking for at least one speaker outside of ARLIS/NA to bring in a fresh perspective on Next Generation OPACs. Additional speakers (3-4) will discuss the implications of the latest OPAC technology for art information retrieval, including visual aspects of OPAC design and user participation in interactive catalogs.
Description – format/structure: Panel Presentation followed by discussion.
Learning outcomes: To inform art librarians of cutting edge developments in library catalog technology, especially those innovations that will benefit users of art and architecture libraries; to foster creative thinking about the use of non-library technology in art libraries; to empower them to lobby vendors for improved services for their users and to make informed contributions to library system and technology selection committees.
Skill Level Expected: Basic
Impact to ARLIS/NA Members: This session will help art librarians maintain awareness and understanding of current technological advancements and changing trends in user services. It will elucidate art library users’ demands for improved Web services. Attendees will be able to anticipate and respond to users’ needs with appropriate information retrieval systems and services at the institutional and local levels.
AV REQUIRED: Yes
AV textfield: Digital projector and screen required for presentations, podium and speaker microphone requested, as well as panel respondent microphones. Internet access is desirable, but not absolutely necessary.
Budget: $150 honorarium to bring in a one expert in online public access catalogs (ARLIS/NA non-member) or two local non-ARLIS/NA speakers.
Room Set-up: Theatre
Number of attendees: 50-75
Online Delivery: Yes
Submitted by: Bryan Loar and Megan Macken


ARLIS/NA President’s Message – Transitional Executive Board Structure

“A journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step.”
- Confucius

Dear ARLIS/NA Members,

To those of you who are not yet out on a gondola in Venice, perusing the marketplaces of Greece, or simply lost in a racy art mystery by a pool, I can, at least, bring you exciting news to salute over your next summer glass of wine about our Society making first steps toward updating the configuration of our organization!

While the Executive Board continues to gather the committee, division, section and roundtable reports with your feedback about the Assessment Task Force Recommendations, we have had our own discussions about the recommendations for the structure of the board. Based on those discussions, the Executive Board voted to adopt the configuration as proposed by the Assessment Task Force in hybrid form with the current structure, for the next couple of years.

By combining elements of the traditional structure with a new and developing structure, we will have the opportunity to explore the new board positions while preserving continuity with the current positions. Certainly, this does make for slightly more demanding appointments, but this seemed to be the most appropriate approach to managing the transition and for allowing time to work through shaping the new board positions.

As we begin to implement the additional roles Cate Cooney, Eastern Regional Representative, will serve as Chapter Coordinator and work with the chapter officers to devise membership guidelines; Sue Koskinen, West Regional Representative, will become our Communications Officer and will begin to search for a technology advisor; Marilyn Nasserden, Canadian Regional Representative, will serve as Development Coordinator and has joined the Development Committee to work on sponsorship strategies; Elizabeth Schaub, South Regional Representative, will serve as the Education Coordinator and become Co-chair of the Mentor Committee (when that forms); and Amy Trendler, our Midwest Regional Representative, will serve as Conference Coordinator, and has recently joined the Denver and Indianapolis Conference Planning Advisory Committee discussions.

We will all be learning more about how these roles will serve our Society as we go. I think the change offers much potential for us. Outlined below please find an abbreviated version of the new transitional structure of the Executive Board. You’ll notice that the most significant changes come with the regional representatives. Your feedback, throughout the year, to help us shape these positions will be welcome. Please revisit the original ARLIS/NA Organizational Assessment, too, for more details at http://www.arlisna.org/arlismembers/membersindex.html

More updates to come. Remember to visit the News & Events section of the website for news headlines and messages from your Executive Board.

Cheers,
Deborah K. Ultan Boudewyns, President, ARLIS/NA

———————————————————————
Transitional Executive Board Structure – Highlights of most significant changes

EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE:
President- Deborah K. Ultan Boudewyns

  • As proposed – no significant changes

Past President- Ann Whiteside

  • Implement the recommended direct reports to alleviate some responsibilities on the regional reps (this way the reps will have time to serve in their elected roles as well as adopt some aspects of the proposed functional roles during this trial/hybrid year.)
  • Direct Reports: Standards Com, Cat Advis Com, instead of liaison to Society Liaisons (leave to Pres) pick up Public Policy, continue as IRC liaison, continue with SEI implementation as Co-liaison with Education Officer.

Vice-President/President Elect – Ken Soehner

  • As proposed – some reporting changes

Treasurer- Fran Scott

  • As proposed – no significant changes

Secretary- Rebecca Price

  • Co-liaison to Membership Committee w/current liaison
  • Co-liaison to Headquarters with President
  • Examine necessity/value of local chapter sec taking minutes at mid-yr and conferences
  • Develop minutes guidelines if alternative sec is used and/or for future secretaries

FUNCTIONAL OFFICERS:
Chapters Coordinator- Cate Cooney

  • Coordinate funding requests for chapters
  • Work with other reg reps on their specific issues and/or discussions (to exercise ‘coordinator’ concept)
  • Work with reg reps and chapters on Bylaw changes or issues
  • Facilitate Chapter Officer discussions as needed
  • Work with Marilyn and the Canadian Chapters (help determine whether we best continue the Canadian Rep or find out if it may not be necessary)
  • Continue as Eastern Regional Rep

Development/Marketing- Marilyn Nasserden

  • Become Co-liaison to the Development Committee – advise conference planners and Development Committee on fundraising and assist with fundraising activities as appointed
  • Co-liaison to Membership Committee with Secretary
  • Continue as Canadian Regional Rep

Education Coordinator- Elizabeth Schaub

  • Continue as Professional Development Committee Liaison
  • Co-chair Mentor Sub-Committee
  • Co-liaison of Education Task Force with President
  • SEI Implementation Co-liaison with VP
  • Continue as South Regional Rep

Communication- Sue Koskinen

  • Continue as Publications Liaison
  • Technology Special Appointment – develop idea and help implement
  • Continue as West Regional Rep

Conference Planning- Amy Trendler

  • Serve as Co-Chair of CPAC with Pres
  • Serve as Liaison (mediator) between CPAC and Conference Manager – eliminate excessive email/communications
  • Oversee CPAC deadlines
  • Go to CPAC – (and use this experience to begin to mold officer role for next year)
  • Continue as Midwest Regional Rep

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 241 other followers